Maruf Bepary

Home
Projects
Credentials
Blog

Comparing GraphQL and REST: A Detailed Overview

Choosing the Right API Design Approach

Building APIs for modern applications requires robust and flexible technologies. In the world of API design architectures, GraphQL and REST are two major players. This article provides a detailed comparison of these technologies, diving deep into what they are, their benefits, weaknesses, and how they compare in different scenarios.

Introduction to REST and GraphQL

What is REST?

REST (Representational State Transfer) is an architectural style for designing networked applications. Invented by Roy Fielding in 2000, it suggests certain constraints for building web services, which when applied correctly, can produce highly scalable, stateless, and cacheable APIs.

RESTful APIs are resource-based, meaning they use simple HTTP methods, like GET, POST, DELETE, and PUT, to create, read, update, and delete data on the server. This straightforward approach makes REST a great fit for public APIs consumed by various clients.

However, REST has its shortcomings, notably over-fetching, under-fetching, and the need for multiple round trips to the server to fetch related resources.

What is GraphQL?

GraphQL is a query language for APIs and a runtime for executing those queries against your data. Developed internally by Facebook in 2012, and publicly released in 2015, GraphQL provides an efficient and powerful alternative to REST.

Unlike REST, GraphQL allows clients to dictate exactly what data they need, which can lead to more efficient data loading. This approach makes it possible to fetch multiple resources in a single request, reducing the amount of data transferred over the network and addressing some of the main shortcomings of REST.

Over-fetching and Under-fetching with REST

One of the main issues with REST APIs is over-fetching and under-fetching of data.

Over-fetching with REST

Over-fetching occurs when the client downloads more information than is necessary. For example, let's say we have a blog application, and we want to display a list of blog post titles on the homepage. With REST, we might end up fetching complete blog post resources (including content, author, comments) instead of just the titles. This is an example of over-fetching - we've downloaded more data than we needed, wasting bandwidth and processing power.

Under-fetching with REST

Under-fetching, on the other hand, is when an API endpoint doesn't provide enough information. Using the same blog application example, let's say we need to display a blog post along with its author's details and comments. In a RESTful service, these entities may be exposed on different endpoints (/posts/:id, /authors/:id, /posts/:id/comments). Hence, the client would have to make multiple requests to gather all the required information. This leads to under-fetching and additional requests to get the complete data.

How GraphQL Addresses REST's Shortcomings

No Over-fetching or Under-fetching with GraphQL

GraphQL addresses the problems of over-fetching and under-fetching by allowing the client to request exactly what it needs. Using a type system, it describes the data available, and the client can form tailored requests based on this schema.

Let's consider our blog application again. With GraphQL, if we needed just the blog post titles, we can construct a query that asks specifically for this data. Here's what that might look like:

query {
  posts {
    title
  }
}

The server would then return a JSON object with exactly what we asked for—no more, no less:

{
  "data": {
    "posts": [
      { "title": "Blog Post 1" },
      { "title": "Blog Post 2" },
      //...additional posts
    ]
  }
}

Efficient

Data Loading with GraphQL

When it comes to fetching related resources, GraphQL shines. In a single request, you can retrieve a blog post, its author's details, and its comments. An example query might look like this:

query {
  post(id: "1") {
    title
    content
    author {
      name
      bio
    }
    comments {
      content
    }
  }
}

This efficiency can lead to faster loading times and improved user experience.

When to Choose REST over GraphQL?

Despite GraphQL's advantages in terms of performance and flexibility, REST still remains a popular choice for a number of reasons:

Simplicity

One of the primary reasons to choose REST over GraphQL is its simplicity. REST uses HTTP methods explicitly (GET for reading, POST for creating, PUT for updating, DELETE for removing), which makes it easy to understand what a particular API call does just by looking at the request type.

Widespread Usage and Support

REST has been around since the year 2000, and it's supported virtually everywhere. Many languages and frameworks have built-in or third-party libraries to handle creating and consuming RESTful APIs. There's also a lot of tooling and middleware available for dealing with common tasks like rate limiting, API key authentication, request validation, and more.

Caching

HTTP caching is a powerful feature that can significantly improve the performance of your APIs, and REST takes full advantage of it. With standard HTTP caching headers in play, you can easily cache responses on the client-side, intermediary proxies, or CDNs. While GraphQL also supports caching, it's not as straightforward or standardized as with REST.

Stateless Servers

REST is stateless, meaning each HTTP request happens in complete isolation. When the client makes an HTTP request, it includes all information necessary for the server to fulfill that request. The server can be stateless, meaning it doesn't need to know anything about what state the client is in and keep less information. This is a significant advantage for scaling a service horizontally.

When GraphQL Might Not Be the Best Option

While GraphQL can provide several benefits, there are situations where it might not be the best choice:

Overkill for Simple APIs

If your application's data requirements are very simple, using GraphQL might be overkill. For example, if you're building a straightforward CRUD application with no complex nested resources, a REST API would be easier to design and just as effective.

Learning Curve and Tooling

GraphQL has a learning curve, and your team might require training to understand how to use it effectively. Furthermore, while GraphQL's ecosystem is growing, it doesn't match the extensive range of tooling and middleware available for REST.

Conclusion

Both REST and GraphQL have their unique strengths and are powerful tools for API development. REST has been a standard choice for many due to its simplicity, widespread usage, and comprehensive tooling support. It is especially beneficial for simple APIs, given its stateless nature and straightforward caching mechanisms.

On the other hand, GraphQL provides advantages in terms of performance and flexibility, particularly in complex applications. It enables clients to specify exactly what they need, reducing the issues of over-fetching and under-fetching seen in REST. However, adopting GraphQL may involve a steeper learning curve and considerations around increased query complexity.

The choice between REST and GraphQL should be made after considering various factors like your project's complexity, the team's expertise, and the nature of your data. For instance, if your API needs to cater to diverse client data requirements with nested relationships, GraphQL might be a better choice. For simpler, stateless APIs, REST could serve just as effectively, if not more so.

To make the best decision, evaluate your project's specific needs, understand the strengths and weaknesses of each approach, and consider the overall impact on your application's performance, scalability, and maintainability.

Sources